Evaluación formativa mediante el portafolio de 4 promociones de residentes de medicina de familia y comunitaria de la Unidad Docente de Murcia / Training evaluation using the four courses portfolio in primary care residents of a Teaching Unit in Murcia

Objetivo: Evaluar el cumplimiento y la calidad de los 10 grupos de tareas formativas previstas en el modelo de portafolio formativo que realizan todos los residentes de la Unidad Docente de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria de Murcia. Diseño: Estudio transversal realizado con los portafolios cumplimentados y entregados por todos los residentes en mayo de 2011. Participantes: Todos los residentes que en ese momento se estaban formando en la unidad docente (131). Método: Se establecen 10 grupos de tareas formativas de las recomendadas por la comisión nacional de la especialidad. Se evalúa el cumplimiento de cada una de ellas en cada uno de los portafolios. Se calcula la frecuencia de cumplimiento para cada tarea formativa. Se califica la calidad de la realización de cada una de las tareas, de 0 (muy deficiente) a 10 puntos (excelente). Resultados: Respecto al grado de cumplimiento, las tareas que más se cumplen: cumplimentar correctamente el libro del residente y utilizar la guía de competencias, ambas con un99,24%; seguidas de la elaboración de informes de reflexión sobre las estancias formativas. Todas las tareas obtienen un porcentaje de cumplimiento superior al 67%. El porcentaje medio de cumplimiento es del 86,49%. Todas las tareas obtienen una nota media superior a 7 (notable).La calificación media global fue de 7,80 puntos. Conclusiones: El grado de cumplimiento de las tareas previstas en el portafolio por los residentes es muy satisfactorio. Es necesario seguir insistiendo en la mejora de la realización del portafolio (AU)

Objective: To evaluate the performance and quality of the 10 groups of training tasks envisaged in the portfolio training model undertaken by all residents of the Primary Care Teaching Unit in Murcia. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted on the portfolios provided and completed by all residents in May 2011.ParticipantsAll residents who were in training at that time (131). Method: Ten groups of training tasks were established from those recommended by the National Commission for the specialty. The performance of each one in each of the portfolios was evaluated, and the compliance for each training task was calculated. The quality of the performance of each of the tasks was given a score, 0 points (very poor) to 10 points (excellent). Results: As regards compliance, the tasks that were most performed were: filling in the Resident book correctly and using the resident skills guide, both with 99.24%, followed by reflection reports on the training visits. All tasks had a compliance rate higher than 67%. The mean percentage of compliance was 86.49%. All tasks obtained an average score greater than 7 (outstanding). The overall mean score was 7,8 points. Conclusions: The level of perfomance of the tasks set out in the portfolio by the residents was very satisfying. It is necessary to continue working on improving the performance of the portfolio (AU)

[Training evaluation using the four courses portfolio in primary care residents of a Teaching Unit in Murcia]. / Evaluación formativa mediante el portafolio de 4 promociones de residentes de medicina de familia y comunitaria de la Unidad Docente de Murcia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance and quality of the 10 groups of training tasks envisaged in the portfolio training model undertaken by all residents of the Primary Care Teaching Unit in Murcia. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted on the portfolios provided and completed by all residents in May 2011. PARTICIPANTS: All residents who were in training at that time (131). METHOD: Ten groups of training tasks were established from those recommended by the National Commission for the specialty. The performance of each one in each of the portfolios was evaluated, and the compliance for each training task was calculated. The quality of the performance of each of the tasks was given a score, 0 points (very poor) to 10 points (excellent). RESULTS: As regards compliance, the tasks that were most performed were: filling in the Resident book correctly and using the resident skills guide, both with 99.24%, followed by reflection reports on the training visits. All tasks had a compliance rate higher than 67%. The mean percentage of compliance was 86.49%. All tasks obtained an average score greater than 7 (outstanding). The overall mean score was 7,8 points. CONCLUSIONS: The level of perfomance of the tasks set out in the portfolio by the residents was very satisfying. It is necessary to continue working on improving the performance of the portfolio.